Evaluation of Maize and Soybean as A Sole and Intercrop Under Various Planting Geometries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38211/joarps.2025.06.314Keywords:
Maize, Soybeans, Intercropping, Planting geometries, Land equivalent ratio, Benefit cost ratioAbstract
Soil fertility and sustainability is intensively affected by monocropping system of maize in Pakistan. The maize-legume intercropping with suitable planting geometry can be an appropriate strategy that can improve sustainable soil fertility. Keeping in view the above facts, a field experiment was conducted at Agronomic Research Area, University of Agriculture Faisalabad during Autumn season 2023-24 under the following treatments i.e. two Planting Geometries: G1 = 60 cm apart ridge plantation, G2 = 75 cm apart ridge plantation with three Planting Techniques: T1 = Sole maize, T2 = Sole soybean, T3 = Maize-soybean Intercropping. Randomized complete block design with split plot arrangements was used with three replications. All the agro-physiological parameters of both crops were assessed by adopting approved/standard procedures. Recorded data was analyzed statistically by using Fisher’s analysis of variance techniques and treatments means’ were compared by Least Significant Difference (LSD) test at 5% probability level. Results revealed that in case of maize, maximum grain yield, biological yield and Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) were reported with T1 (Sole maize plantation), however minimum values for above mentioned parameters were reported with T3 (Maize soybean intercropping). Similarly, in case of soybean, maximum grain yield, biological yield and BCR were reported with T2 (Sole soybean plantation), however minimum values for these above mentioned parameters were reported with T3 (Maize soybean intercropping). Intercropping systems were assessed by Land Equivalent Ratio (LER). Results revealed that maximum value of LER (1.18) was recorded with G1T3 (60 cm apart ridge plantation of maize soybean intercropping), it was concluded that 75 cm apart sole maize plantation and 75cm apart ridge plantation of maize-soybean intercropping would be a feasible approach under the agro-ecological conditions of Faisalabad, Pakistan
Downloads
References
Abou-Elela, A. M., Abd El-Razek, U. A., & Khalil, H. E. (2012). Yield and its components of maize/soybean intercropping systems as affected by planting time and distribution. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 6, 238–245.
Ahmad, A., Wahid, M. A., Fazal, M. W., Anees, M. U., Arshad, M. A., & Saeed, M. T. (2016). Agro-economic assessment of maize-soybean intercropping system. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, 16, 1719–1725.
Andrade, F. H., Calviño, P., Cirilo, A., & Barbieri, P. (2002). Yield responses to narrow rows depend on increased radiation interception. Agronomy Journal, 94, 975–980. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2002.0975 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2002.9750
Asad, S. A., Wahid, M. A., Shaheen, F., Raza, A., & Farooq, M. (2020). Soybean production in Pakistan: Experiences, challenges and prospects. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 24, 995–1005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17957/IJAB/15.1526
Beadle, V. V., Adami, P. F., de Moraes, P. V. D., Oligini, K. F., Giacomel, C. L., & Link, L. (1987). Row arrangements of maize and soybean intercrop on silage quality and grain yield. Journal of Agricultural Science, 11, 286–295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v11n2p286
Chu, G. X., Shen, Q. R., & Cao, J. L. (2004). Nitrogen fixation and N transfer from peanut to rice cultivated in aerobic soil in an intercropping system and its effect on soil N fertility. Plant and Soil, 263, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PLSO.0000047722.49160.9e DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PLSO.0000047722.49160.9e
El-Hamidi, M., & Zaher, F. A. (2018). Production of vegetable oils in the world and in Egypt: An overview. Bulletin of the National Research Centre, 42, 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-018-0019-0
Ghosh, P. K., Manna, M. C., Bandyopadhyay, K. K., Tripathi, A. K., Wanjari, R. H., & Hati, K. M. (2006). Interspecific interaction and nutrient use in soybean/sorghum intercropping system. Agronomy Journal, 98, 1097–1108. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0328 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0328
GOP. (2023). Economic survey of Pakistan 2022–23. Ministry of Finance, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad.
Grote, U., Fasse, A., Nguyen, T. T., & Erenstein, O. (2021). Food security and the dynamics of wheat and maize value chains in Africa and Asia. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.617009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.617009
Hussain, N., Mishra, P., Raghav, Y. S., Gautam, R., & Supriya. (2023). Future outlook of maize sector in Pakistan: A 2030 perspective. Economic Affairs, 68, 385–390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.1.2023.4
Iqbal, N., Hussain, S., Ahmed, Z., Yang, F., Wang, X., Liu, W., Yong, T., Du, J., Shu, K., Yang, W., & Liu, J. (2019). Comparative analysis of maize–soybean strip intercropping systems: A review. Plant Production Science, 22, 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/1343943X.2018.1548114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1343943X.2018.1541137
Jabbar, M. H., Cui, L., Abbas, G., Raza, M. A., Anwar, A., Ahmed, Z., Waheed, A., Saeed, A., Ahmed, W., Babar, M. J., Ahmad, S., Tariq, R., Ajmal, M. M., Bajwa, A. A., Doğan, H., Yang, F., & Yang, W. (2023). Effect of row spacing under maize-soybean relay intercropping system on yield, competition, and economic returns. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 47, 390–401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-011X.3095
Kane, D. A., Bradford, M. A., Fuller, E., Oldfield, E. E., & Wood, S. A. (2021). Soil organic matter protects US maize yields and lowers crop insurance payouts under drought. Environmental Research Letters, 16, 022005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abe492
Kane, L. (2022). Soybean research, genetics, physiology, agronomy and nitrogen relationship. Field Crops Research, 189, 35–39.
Li, X., Liu, J., Duan, P., & Zhang, F. (2019). Effects of maize-soybean intercropping on crop productivity and nitrogen utilization. Field Crops Research, 236, 71–79.
Liu, H., Chen, S., Li, B., Guo, S., Tian, J., Yao, L., & Lin, C. (2022). The effect of strip orientation and width on radiation interception in maize–soybean strip intercropping systems. Food and Energy Security, 2, 365–373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.364
Madhukar, A., Kumar, V., & Dashora, K. (2020). Spatial and temporal trends in the yields of three major crops: Wheat, rice and maize in India. International Journal of Plant Production, 14, 187–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-019-00078-0
Maitra, S., Hossain, A., Brestic, M., Skalicky, M., Ondrisik, P., Gitari, H., Brahmachari, K., Shankar, T., Bhadra, P., Palai, J. B., Jena, J., Bhattacharya, U., Duvvada, S. K., Lalichetti, S., & Sairam, M. (2021). Intercropping—A low input agricultural strategy for food and environmental security. International Journal of Plant Production, 11, 343–367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11020343
Mao, L. L., Zhang, L. Z., Zhang, S. P., Evers, J. B., van der Werf, W., Wang, J. J., Sun, H. Q., Su, Z. C., & Spiertz, H. (2015). Resource use efficiency, ecological intensification and sustainability of intercropping systems. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14, 1542–1550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61039-5
Mut, Z., Kardes, Y. M., & Erbas Kose, O. D. (2022). Determining the grain yield and nutritional composition of maize cultivars in different growing groups. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 27, 158–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.1107691
Patra, A. K. (2021). Advances in poultry nutrition research. Journal of Bioresource Management, 2, 159–185.
Qiao, F. (2023). The impact of mechanization on crop production in China. Applied Economics, 55, 1728–1741. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2022.2099524
Rhoades, J. D. (2018). Salinity: Electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids. In Methods of Soil Analysis: Chemical Methods (pp. 417–435). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c14
Sari, A. Y., & Kirda, C. (2008). Maize yield response to deficit irrigation and plant density under semi-arid climate. Field Crops Research, 2, 131–140.
Siamabele, B. (2021). The significance of soybean production in the face of changing climates in Africa. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 7, 125–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2021.1933745
Steel, R. G. D., Torrie, J. H., & Dicky, D. A. (1997). Principles and procedures of statistics: A biometrical approach (3rd ed., pp. 352–358). McGraw Hill.
Thomas, G. W. (2018). Soil pH and soil acidity. In Methods of Soil Analysis: Chemical Methods (pp. 475–490). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c16
Wilton, M. (2019). A broad-scale characterization of corn (Zea mays)–soybean (Glycine max) intercropping as a sustainable-intensive cropping practice. International Journal of Plant Production, 245, 266–281.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Ahmed Irfan , Haroon Zaman Khan, Anjum Naeem, Muhammad Adil, Muhammad Qadeer, Muhammad Faisal Raza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
