Optimizing Tomato Grafts for Improved Growth, Yield and Fruit Quality

Fakhar Imam; Dr. Noor un nisa Memon; Mujahid Hussain Leghari; Saghir Ahmed Sheikh

doi:10.38211/joarps.2024.05.01.211

Authors

Fakhar Imam Department of Horticulture, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam, Pakistan
Dr. Noor un nisa Memon Department of Horticulture, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam, Pakistan
Mujahid Hussain Leghari Department of Horticulture, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam, Pakistan
Saghir Ahmed Sheikh Hamdard University, karachi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38211/joarps.2024.05.01.211

Keywords:

stionic establishment, Kernel production, quality characteristics

Abstract

Low tomato production and yield in the country can be attributed to various biotic and abiotic stresses. To mitigate the impact of these challenges, vegetable grafting is gaining popularity worldwide. Furthermore, tomato growers are adopting hybrid varieties, but the majority of them face challenges affording the cost of hybrid seeds. This study was conducted in 2018 to investigate successful tomato grafting techniques aimed at enhancing growth, yield, and fruit quality. This study examined three distinct rootstocks (AS-2565, Bush beefsteak, and Roma vf), three high-yielding scion varieties (Super tomato, Rio-grande, and T-1359), and employed two grafting methods (splice and cleft). Non-grafted plants were maintained as check plants. The grafting methods showed non-significant differences in all studied parameters except grafting success, whereas the scion-rootstock combinations exhibited highly significant differences. The highest grafting success, number of fruits per plant, fruit length, fruit diameter, fruit weight, and yield per plant were observed in the T-1359 scion grafted onto the Bush beefsteak (BBS) rootstock. Regarding quality characteristics, higher levels of total soluble solids (TSS) and pH were observed in non-grafted Super tomato plants. In terms of vitamin C, titratable acidity (TA), and lycopene content, the T-1359 scion performed better across various rootstocks. In conclusion, T-1359 grafted onto the BBS rootstock proved to be a superior scion-rootstock combination in terms of growth, yield, and quality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bisognin, D.A., Velasquez, I. & Widders, I. (2005). Cucumber seedling dependence on cotyledonary leaves for early growth. Bras. Brasilia, 40:531-539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2005000600002

Bumgarner, N.R. & Kleinhenz, M.D. (2014). Grafting guide–A pictorial guide to the cleft and splice graft methods. The Ohio State University. Ohio Agriculture Research Development Centre. Bulletin No. 950.

Ceballos, R., & Rioja, T. (2019). Rootstock affects the blend of biogenic volatile organic compounds emitted by ‘Hass’ avocado. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research. 79:330-334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392019000200330

Chetelat, R.T. & Petersen, J.P. (2003). Improved maintenance of the tomato like Solanum spp. by grafting. TGC 53:14–15.

Davis, A.R., Fish, W.W. & Perkins-Veazie, P. (2003). A rapid hexane-free method for analysing lycopene content in watermelon. Journal of Food Sciences., 68(1):328-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2003.tb14160.x

Di Gioia, F., Serio, F., Buttaro, D., Ayala, O. & Santamaria, P. (2010). Inﬂuence of rootstock on vegetative growth, fruit yield, and quality in ‘Cuore di Bue’, an heirloom tomato. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology. 85:477–482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2010.11512701

Draie, R. (2017). Influence of grafting method in the quality of tomato seedlings grafted and intended for commercialization. International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Applied Science. 3(8):87-103.

Fernandez-Garcia, N., Martinez, V. & Carvajal, M. (2004). Fruit quality of grafted tomato plants grown under saline conditions. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 79:995– 1001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2004.11511880

Gisbert, C., Prohens, J., Raigón, M.D., Stommel, J.R. & Nuez, F. (2011). Eggplant relatives as sources of variation for developing new rootstocks: Effects of grafting on eggplant yield and fruit apparent quality and composition. Scientia Horticulture. 128(1):14-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.12.007

Hortwitz, W. (1960). Official Methods of Analysis, 8th ed. Associates of official Agric. Chemists Inc. Washington D.C.

Ibrahim, M., Munira, M.K., Kabir, M.S., Islam, A.K.M.S. & Miah, M.M.U. (2001). Seed germination and graft compatibility of wild Solanum as rootstock of tomato. Journal of Biological Sciences. 1: 701-703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2001.701.703

Johnson, S., Kreider, P. & Miles, C. (2011). Vegetable Grafting Eggplants and Tomatoes Washington State University, p4.

Kacjan, M.N. & Osvald, J. (2004). The influence of grafting on yield of two tomato cultivars (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) grown in a plastic house. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica, 83:243–249.

Khah, E.M., Kakava, E., Mavromatis, A., Chachalis, D. & Goulas, C. (2006). Effect of grafting on growth and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) in greenhouse and open field. Journal of Applied Horticulture. 8:3–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37855/jah.2006.v08i01.01

Kubota, C., McClure, M.A., Burelle, N.K., Bausher, M.G. & Rosskopf, E.N. (2008). Vegetable grafting: History, use, and current technology status in North America. HortScience. 43:1664–1669. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.43.6.1664

Kumar, P., Rouphael, Y., Cardarelli, M. & Colla, G. (2015). Effect of nickel and grafting combination on yield, fruit quality, antioxidative enzyme activities, lipid peroxidation, and mineral composition of tomato. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science. 178:848-860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201400651

Larsen, S.U. & Andreasen, C. (2004). Light and heavy seeds differ in germination percentage and mean germination thermal time. Crop Science. 44:1710-1720. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.1710

Lee, C., Tsao, S.J., Bie, Z., Echevarria, P.H., Morra, L. & Oda, M. (2010). Current status of vegetable grafting: Diffusion, grafting techniques, automation. Scientia Horticulturae. 127:93-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.08.003

Mari, F.M. (2009). Structure and efficiency analysis of vegetable production and marketing in Sindh, Pakistan. Unpublished PhD Thesis in the Department of Agricultural Economics, Sindh Agriculture University, Tando Jam.

Marsic, N.K. & Osvald J. (2004). The influence of grafting on yield of two tomato cultivars (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) grown in a plastic house. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica, 83:243–249.

Milenković, L., Mastilović, J., Kevrešan, Z., Jakšić, A., Gledić, A., Šunić, L., Stanojević, L. & Ilić S.Z. 2018. Tomato fruit yield and quality as affected by grafting and shading. Journal of Food Science and Nutrition. 4(3):1-9.

Mohamed, F.H., Abd El-Hamed, K.E., Elwan, M.W.M. & Hussien, M.N.E. (2014). Evaluation of different grafting methods and rootstocks in watermelon grown in Egypt. Scientia Horticulturae, 168:145–150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2014.01.029

Oda, M. (1998). Grafting of Vegetables to Improve Greenhouse Production. Osaka Prefecture University, Sakai Osaka, Japan. 11pp.

Pogonyi, A., Pek, Z., Helyes, L. & Lugasi, A. (2005). Effect of grafting on the tomato’s yield, quality and main fruit components in spring forcing. Acta Elimentaria, 34: 453–462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/AAlim.34.2005.4.12

Rashid, M.A., Rahman, A., Ahmed, B., Luther, G.C., & Black, L. (2004). Demonstration and pilot production of grafted eggplant and grafted tomato and training of farmers. Retrieved Dec. 2018 from http://ww.avrdc.org.

Rivard, C.L. & Louws, F.G. (2011). Tomato Grafting for Disease Resistance and Increased Productivity. Kansas State University, Kansas City. 8pp.

Ruck, J.A. (1961). Chemical Methods for Analysis of Fruits and Vegetables. No. 1154.Research Station Summerland, Research Branch Canada, Deptt. of Agri.

Shao G.C., Deng S., Liu N., Wang M.H. & She D.L. 2015. Fruit quality and yield of tomato as influenced by rain shelters and deficit irrigation. J. Agri. Sci. and Techn. 17: 691-704.

Soe, D.W., Win, Z.Z. & K.T. Myint. (2018). Effects of different rootstocks on plant growth, development and yield of grafted tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Journal of Agriculture Research. 5:30-38.

Statistix. (2006). Statistics 8 user guide, version 1.0. Analytical software, P.O. Box 12185, Tallahassee fl 32317 USA.

Turhan, A., Ozmen, N., Serbeci, M.S. & Seniz, V. (2011). Effects of grafting on different rootstocks on tomato fruit yield and quality. Horticultural Science. 38(4): 142–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/51/2011-HORTSCI

Yahia, E.M., García-Solís, P. & Celis M.E.M. (2019). Postharvest Physiology and Biochemistry of Fruits and Vegetables . Sawston, UK: Woodhead Publishing; 2019. Contribution of fruits and vegetables to human nutrition and health; pp. 19–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813278-4.00002-6

Zhang, Y., Li Y., Liang S., Zheng W., Chen X., Liu J. & Wang A. (2022). Study on the preparation and effect of tomato seedling disease biocontrol compound seed-coating agent. Life (Basel).12(6):849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/life12060849